Compositae name details

Dimorphanthes Cass.

1077349  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1077349)

 unaccepted
Genus

Species Dimorphanthes aegyptiaca (L.) Cass. accepted as Erigeron aegyptiacus L.
Species Dimorphanthes ambigua C.Presl accepted as Erigeron bonariensis L.
Species Dimorphanthes angustifolia Cass. accepted as Erigeron bonariensis L.
Species Dimorphanthes apurensis (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Conyza laevigata (Rich.) Pruski
Species Dimorphanthes bidentata Cass. accepted as Psiadia callocephala Cordem.
Species Dimorphanthes chinensis Cass. accepted as Conyza laevigata (Rich.) Pruski
Species Dimorphanthes coronopifolia (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Conyza coronopifolia Kunth
Species Dimorphanthes crispa Rupr. accepted as Erigeron bonariensis L.
Species Dimorphanthes floribunda (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Erigeron floribundus (Kunth) Sch.Bip.
Species Dimorphanthes gouanii (L.) Cass. accepted as Erigeron gouanii L.
Species Dimorphanthes hispida (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Erigeron bonariensis L.
Species Dimorphanthes linifolia (Willd.) Rupr. accepted as Erigeron bonariensis L.
Species Dimorphanthes myosotifolia (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Erigeron primulifolium (Lam.) Greuter
Species Dimorphanthes obtusa (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Conyza coronopifolia Kunth
Species Dimorphanthes procera Cass. accepted as Erigeron primulifolium (Lam.) Greuter
Species Dimorphanthes sicula (Willd.) Cass. accepted as Pulicaria sicula (L.) Moris
Species Dimorphanthes sophiifolia (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Laennecia sophiifolia (Kunth) G.L.Nesom
Species Dimorphanthes stipulacea Cass. accepted as Conyza ulmifolia (Burm.f.) Kuntze
Species Dimorphanthes stipulata Cass. accepted as Conyza ulmifolia (Burm.f.) Kuntze
Species Dimorphanthes thesiifolia (Kunth) Cass. accepted as Conyza thesiifolia Kunth

Species Dimorphanthes pulchella (Kunth) Cass. (uncertain, unassessed)
Species Dimorphanthes sophiifolia Cass. (uncertain, unassessed)
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1825). Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris
page(s): 30 [details]   
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:880DEEF8-80B3-461E-8F3A-1D85D0145165  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:880DEEF8-80B3-461E-8F3A-1D85D0145165 [details]

Taxonomy et in Dict. Sc. Nat. xiii. 254 (1819)  
Taxonomy et in Dict. Sc. Nat. xiii. 254 (1819) [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Dimorphanthes Cass.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1077349 on 2021-03-05
Date
action
by
2008-03-01 07:42:42Z
created
2013-09-19 06:42:42Z
changed

original description (1825). Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris
page(s): 30 [details]   
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
 

From other sources
Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
nom. rejic. against Conyza Lessing 1832 (nom. cons.) [Tropicos]
Notes from Flann et al. 2010 Taxon 59: Type - Erigeron aegyptiacus (‘ægyptiacum’) L. (Eschenbachia globosa Moench, nom. illeg., D. aegyptiaca (L.) Cass. in Cuvier , Dict. Sci. Nat. 13: 255 1819, Conyza aegyptiaca (L.) Aiton) Notes: In the protologue of Dimorphanthes, Cassini includes various Erigeron species in that genus, four of which he mentions by name. In App. III of the ICBN, Dimorphanthes is listed as not yet typified, but this is a double error. Firstly, Cassini when formally transferring Erigeron siculus L. to Dimorphanthes as D. sicula (L.) Cass. (in Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 13: 255 1819), designated it as the type (‘on doit la considérer comme le type d’un nouveau genre’). Secondly, as already noted in ING, one of the four binomials listed in the protologue is Erigeron aegyptiacus, which provides the type of the earlier, legitimate name Eschenbachia. The consequence is that Cassini’s subsequent type designation becomes irrelevant, because Dimorphanthes is automatically typified (ICBN, Art. 7.5). It should be removed editorially from App. III of the Code, where Eschenbachia is already listed as rejected. Whereas in the relevant literature the combination Conyza aegyptiaca (L.) Aiton is still in use, according to Richard Noyes (pers. comm.) the species does not belong to the Erigeron-Conyza complex, so that the name Eschenbachia may eventually be revived. [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1818 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G]
Bull. Sci. Soc. Philom. Paris 1818: 30 [Flann et al. 2010 Cassini Genera]
Bulletin des Sciences, par la Societe Philomatique 1818: [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:880DEEF8-80B3-461E-8F3A-1D85D0145165 [details]

Taxonomy et in Dict. Sc. Nat. xiii. 254 (1819) [details]