Taxonomy possibly the correct generic name when sect. Strobocalyx is elevated to generic rank. Monosis DC. 1836 Prodr. (DC.) 5: 77...
Taxonomy possibly the correct generic name when sect. Strobocalyx is elevated to generic rank. Monosis DC. 1836 Prodr. (DC.) 5: 77 is not a new name. [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Monosis DC.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1075933 on 2024-11-22
original description(1834). Contr. Bot. India[details]
original description(1836). Prodr. (DC.) 5[details]
original description(1836). Prodr. 5 (1836)[details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record 1-10 Oct 1836 [IPNI] Dec 1834 [IPNI] Index Nominum Genericorum 2 (1979) 1115 gives A.P. de Candolle In R.Wight, Contr. Bot. India (Dec. 1834) 5 with the type Monosis wightiana DC., however the publication in Guillemin, above is earlier. [IPNI] possibly the correct generic name when sect. Strobocalyx is elevated to generic rank. [Flora Malesiana] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:E4ECAEA2-9F5C-4168-A0AE-50EDAA2C02BF [details] Taxonomy possibly the correct generic name when sect. Strobocalyx is elevated to generic rank. Monosis DC. 1836 Prodr. (DC.) 5: 77 is not a new name. [details]