Taxonomy The subordinated taxa (a, b) seem to be no infraspecific ones because varieties are indicated by trinomials. In this case,...
Taxonomy The subordinated taxa (a, b) seem to be no infraspecific ones because varieties are indicated by trinomials. In this case, the subordinated taxa are to be understood as a kind of micro-species. Otherwise, A. vulgaris would be an illegitimate name. [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Apargia vulgaris Ruthe. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1101275 on 2024-11-13
original descriptionFl. Mark Brandenb. u. Niederlausitz, ed. 2 page(s): 474 [details]
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Fl. Mark Brandenburg , ed. 2 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] Ruthe, Fl. Mark Brandenburg, ed. 2. 1834 [Cichorieae Portal] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:00662EF1-193E-4BE2-8B9B-902992CD530F [details] Taxonomy The subordinated taxa (a, b) seem to be no infraspecific ones because varieties are indicated by trinomials. In this case, the subordinated taxa are to be understood as a kind of micro-species. Otherwise, A. vulgaris would be an illegitimate name. [details] Type material not indicated [details]