Compositae name details

Libanothamnus gritaensis Cuatrec.

1125319  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1125319)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Millerieae (Tribe)
  13. Espeletiinae (Subtribe)
  14. Libanothamnus (Genus)
  15. Libanothamnus gritaensis (Species)
uncertain > unassessed
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
Not documented
Note 27999, J.Cuatrecasas, L.Marcano-Berti,...  
From other sources
Type material 27999, J.Cuatrecasas, L.Marcano-Berti, M.Lopez-Figueiras, holotype US [details]
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:5F5BC40B-A23A-439D-9DD7-42B7627703A5  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:5F5BC40B-A23A-439D-9DD7-42B7627703A5 [details]

Taxonomy =L. neriifolius v. columbicus X L. occultus  
Taxonomy =L. neriifolius v. columbicus X L. occultus [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Libanothamnus gritaensis Cuatrec.. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1125319 on 2024-06-27
Date
action
by
2008-06-16 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-25 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

Not documented
From other sources
Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Libanothamnus ×gritaensis Cuatrec. [IPNI]
Libanothamnus ×gritaensis Cuatrec. [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:5F5BC40B-A23A-439D-9DD7-42B7627703A5 [details]

Taxonomy =L. neriifolius v. columbicus X L. occultus [details]

Type material 27999, J.Cuatrecasas, L.Marcano-Berti, M.Lopez-Figueiras, holotype US [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-07-05 08:42:06+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino