Taxonomy Probably an error, but Heynhold accepted the name and gave an indirect reference to the basionym, so the combination is...
Taxonomy Probably an error, but Heynhold accepted the name and gave an indirect reference to the basionym, so the combination is validly published [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Centaurea procera (Fisch. & Avé-Lall.) Heynh.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1140636 on 2024-10-26
original description(1847). Alph. Aufz. Gew. page(s): 131 [details]
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Heynh. [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details] Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Centaurea procera Heynh. [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details] Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record (Dipsacaceae) [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:DF6495E2-7BB4-41E8-BDFE-BDB5F6250B35 [details] Taxonomy Probably an error, but Heynhold accepted the name and gave an indirect reference to the basionym, so the combination is validly published [details]