Taxonomy The IPNI record Lasiorrhiza cerberoanii Kuntze seems to be a correction to the epithet under Art. 60C.1a (ICBN 2006) but...
Taxonomy The IPNI record Lasiorrhiza cerberoanii Kuntze seems to be a correction to the epithet under Art. 60C.1a (ICBN 2006) but there is no reason that the epithet cannot be adjectival and then the ending -ana is correct, see Art. 60.C.1c [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Lasiorrhiza cerberoana (J.Rémy) Kuntze. Accessed at: https://compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1145629 on 2025-03-24
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Kuntze [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Lasiorrhiza cerberoana Kuntze [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Notes Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record 5 Nov 1891 [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 350 [LCR Editor] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:D666D7CD-14E1-45E5-94B4-E722971EFB7D [details] Taxonomy The IPNI record Lasiorrhiza cerberoanii Kuntze seems to be a correction to the epithet under Art. 60C.1a (ICBN 2006) but there is no reason that the epithet cannot be adjectival and then the ending -ana is correct, see Art. 60.C.1c [details]