Compositae name details

Athrixia foliosa S.Moore

1169422  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1169422)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Gnaphalieae (Tribe)
  13. Relhaniinae (Subtribe)
  14. Athrixia (Genus)
  15. Athrixia foliosa (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1911). J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 40
page(s): 113 [details] 
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:1BB02679-50BB-4458-821D-1699F85C85C8  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:1BB02679-50BB-4458-821D-1699F85C85C8 [details]

Taxonomy ori:FTA  
Taxonomy ori:FTA [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2025). Global Compositae Database. Athrixia foliosa S.Moore. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/gcd/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1169422 on 2025-09-12
Date
action
by
2007-12-13 07:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-15 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (1911). J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 40
page(s): 113 [details] 
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
S. Moore [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Athrixia foliosa S. Moore [Tropicos] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Journ. Linn. Soc., Bot. xl. 113 (1911). [African Plant Database]
Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 40: [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:1BB02679-50BB-4458-821D-1699F85C85C8 [details]

Taxonomy ori:FTA [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2025-09-13 05:37:51+02:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino