Taxonomy This is a manuscript name mentioned by DC. (1836: 372, sub D. latifolia). Mattfeld (1929: 406) misread the citation and...
Taxonomy This is a manuscript name mentioned by DC. (1836: 372, sub D. latifolia). Mattfeld (1929: 406) misread the citation and attributed it to Desfontaines (1804: 95). The name is not present there, DC. apparently made an error for Grangea latifolia. Contrary to Fosberg & Sachet (1981: 33) that name is not valid. The so-called descriptions by Desfontaines are translations of the epitheta. [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Dichrocephala erecta L'Hér.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1181371 on 2024-11-21
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Authors Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record l'Her. [Flora Malesiana] [details] Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Dichrocephala erecta l'Her. [Flora Malesiana] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:391A81A6-3496-4AB6-ABE5-54CEEF042DEC [details] Taxonomy This is a manuscript name mentioned by DC. (1836: 372, sub D. latifolia). Mattfeld (1929: 406) misread the citation and attributed it to Desfontaines (1804: 95). The name is not present there, DC. apparently made an error for Grangea latifolia. Contrary to Fosberg & Sachet (1981: 33) that name is not valid. The so-called descriptions by Desfontaines are translations of the epitheta. [details]