Compositae name details

Senecio yacuanquensis Cuatrec.

1188495  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1188495)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Senecioneae (Tribe)
  13. Senecio (Genus)
  14. Senecio yacuanquensis (Species)
uncertain > taxon inquirendum (probably conspecific with Senecio otophorus)
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(of Aetheolaena yacuanquensis (Cuatrec.) B.Nord.) (1978). Opera Bot. 44
page(s): 56 [details] 
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B5CF1CCD-F36F-4664-A132-79EDD93DEED0  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B5CF1CCD-F36F-4664-A132-79EDD93DEED0 [details]

Taxonomy Cuatrec. in Rev.Acad. Colomb. vi. 56 (1944)  
Taxonomy Cuatrec. in Rev.Acad. Colomb. vi. 56 (1944) [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Senecio yacuanquensis Cuatrec.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1188495 on 2024-11-23
Date
action
by
2008-05-04 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-28 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina
2020-03-28 15:05:29Z
changed
Calvo Casas, Joel

original description (of Aetheolaena yacuanquensis (Cuatrec.) B.Nord.) (1978). Opera Bot. 44
page(s): 56 [details] 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Unreviewed
Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Senecio yacuanguensis Cuatrec. [IPNI] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:B5CF1CCD-F36F-4664-A132-79EDD93DEED0 [details]

Taxonomy Cuatrec. in Rev.Acad. Colomb. vi. 56 (1944) [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-11-23 01:57:05+01:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino