Compositae name details

Senecio stenopteris Griseb.

1212150  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1212150)

  1. Biota
  2. Plantae (Kingdom)
  3. Viridiplantae (Subkingdom)
  4. Streptophyta (Infrakingdom)
  5. Tracheophyta (Phylum (Division))
  6. Spermatophytina (Subphylum (Subdivision))
  7. Magnoliopsida (Class)
  8. Asteranae (Superorder)
  9. Asterales (Order)
  10. Compositae (Family)
  11. Asteroideae (Subfamily)
  12. Senecioneae (Tribe)
  13. Senecio (Genus)
  14. Senecio stenopteris (Species)
 unaccepted
Species
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1874). Abh. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 19
page(s): 193 [details] 
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6043EBFE-EF8C-48B7-9CCF-F59BF1704FF8  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6043EBFE-EF8C-48B7-9CCF-F59BF1704FF8 [details]

Taxonomy reprint: Pl. Lorentz. 145 (1874)  
Taxonomy reprint: Pl. Lorentz. 145 (1874) [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Senecio stenopteris Griseb.. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1212150 on 2024-10-26
Date
action
by
2008-05-25 06:42:42Z
created
Flann, Christina
2013-09-28 06:42:42Z
changed
Flann, Christina

original description (1874). Abh. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 19
page(s): 193 [details] 
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Senecio stenopterus Griseb. [Flora del Conosur] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Abh. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 19: 193 (1874) [Flora del Conosur]
Abhandlungen der Koniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen 19: [Tropicos] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:6043EBFE-EF8C-48B7-9CCF-F59BF1704FF8 [details]

Taxonomy reprint: Pl. Lorentz. 145 (1874) [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»
Website and databases developed and hosted by Flanders Marine Institute · Page generated on 2024-11-23 05:55:13+01:00 · Contact: Mauricio Bonifacino