Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code...
Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code (this recognized only subspecies at infraspecific rank )., 8 Oct 1906 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. lanceolatus (Nutt.) Piper. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1222724 on 2024-10-26
Present Inaccurate Introduced: alien Containing type locality
Unreviewed
Contributed data: Basionym Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Chrysothamnus lanceolatus [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details] Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus Nutt. subsp. lanceolatus (Nutt.) Piper [IPNI] [details] Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 11 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details] LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:A93EF7A1-D70C-4A13-B7F8-D6D0C1A99A6B [details] Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code (this recognized only subspecies at infraspecific rank )., 8 Oct 1906 [details]