Compositae name details

Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. lanceolatus (Nutt.) Piper

1222724  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1222724)

 unaccepted
Subspecies
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
(1906). Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 11
page(s): 558 [details] 

(of Chrysothamnus lanceolatus Nutt.) (1841). Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. ser. 2, 7
page(s): 324 [details] 
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:A93EF7A1-D70C-4A13-B7F8-D6D0C1A99A6B  
LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:A93EF7A1-D70C-4A13-B7F8-D6D0C1A99A6B [details]

Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code...  
Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code (this recognized only subspecies at infraspecific rank )., 8 Oct 1906 [details]
Compositae Working Group (CWG) (2021). Global Compositae Database. Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus subsp. lanceolatus (Nutt.) Piper. Accessed at: https://www.compositae.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1222724 on 2024-10-26
Date
action
by
2009-08-21 06:42:42Z
created
2013-09-18 06:42:42Z
changed

original description (1906). Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 11
page(s): 558 [details] 

original description (of Chrysothamnus lanceolatus Nutt.) (1841). Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. ser. 2, 7
page(s): 324 [details] 
 
 Present  Inaccurate  Introduced: alien  Containing type locality 
   

Unreviewed
Contributed data: Basionym Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Chrysothamnus lanceolatus [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details]

Contributed data: Full Name Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus Nutt. subsp. lanceolatus (Nutt.) Piper [IPNI] [details]

Contributed data: Published Data only shown for fields conflicting with the consensus taxon record
Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 11 [Govaerts World Compositae Checklist A-G] [details]

LSID urn:lsid:compositae.org:names:A93EF7A1-D70C-4A13-B7F8-D6D0C1A99A6B [details]

Taxonomy Although Piper did not cite the subspecific rank, he (preface 9, paragraph 3) stated that he followed Philadelphia Code (this recognized only subspecies at infraspecific rank )., 8 Oct 1906 [details]